The Editor's Weblog features an interesting post today about the way print publications (newspapers, specifically) are teaching their writers how to write articles so that they are optimized for search engine rankings on Google's news page:
UK newspapers are teaching their reporters how to write articles. How so? By writing in ways that show up at the top of search results from Google and other search engines. This is a look at how the online news portal oligarchy is concretely changing journalism.
The Times of London is training journalists in making their articles show up at the top of Google’s unpaid search results. "You make sure key phrases and topic words are embedded in the top paragraph and headlines," says Zach Leonard, the Times’ digital-media publisher
This isn't exactly news, as businesses of all stripes have jumped on the blogging bandwagon as a way of attracting potential customers to their sites; although, it does seem to suggest that editors are far more willing to blur the line between editorial and advertising than they once were. Online news sites generate additional revenue (for the parent print publication) through the sale of banner and textual ads, and by actively altering the way an article is written to be ranked higher on a search engine listing seems to have more to do with increasing site traffic, and thereby increasing ad impressions, than it does with the quality of the article itself.
Not being a writing instructor, I tend to lurk on Kairosnews more often than not, but I decided to post this, because I think the implication for the effect of SEO on the quality of web writing merits discussion.
My daytime gig is marketing, and I'm all too familiar with the importance of using specific formulas to determine the number of times particular keyphrases need to appear in web texts that you want highly ranked on the major search engines. That may be all right (I stress may be.) for commercial efforts, but journalism was once considered above that. My concern is a developing trend of web texts being created and posted for the sake of generating traffic instead of actually providing useful or meaningful content.
Any thoughts?



related analysis from The Editor's Weblog
You can read a related article on The Editor's Weblog that analyzes this issue here.