A stylistic note... just now, I cut and paste an excerpt from someone else's blog. The passage that I copied has lots of links. A passage that I chose not to excerpt has even more links -- and I am simply too lazy to re-create (especially when the source text is just a click away). (If you're curoius, here's the post.)
I'm conscious that leaving those links out changes the tone of the original. Of course, removing the excerpt from its original context and inserting it into my own context also changes the text... but the omission of hyperlinks seems like a silent form of censorship. I often find myself selecting blocks that don't contain hyperlinks, simply so I won't have to wrestle with this problem. Do I worry too much about this sort of thing?



Well, I wouldn't call it censorship
I don't think it's "censorship." After all, we've been quoting for millennia. Picking and choosing what material to quote doesn't amount to censorship in my book.
On the other hand, it might be "misquoting." After all, you've left out part of the information from the original quote. In this sense, it could be used to quote someone out of out of context--especially if the link in the original was used for ironic effect to contradict what was being said.
But all of this depends on the context of the original--links could be merely informational, or even superfluous (not to mention broken).
So, I'd say it's only a problem if the quoting/omitting links distorts the meaning of the original--which is the same criterion we've been applying to ethical use of quotes for all these millennia.
imho.
--Dave
Misquoting
Yes, "censorhip" was perhaps too loaded. But I was hoping to get an emotional response.
:)
Dennis G. Jerz
Jerz's Literacy Weblog
misquoting
good point. but then again, if the text were printed out, it wouldn't have a live link, although it might have a textual representation, such as an underline, which would indicate that the link was there.
still, if you are providing a link to the original text, i would tend to think that it's an acceptable practice.
The links are a must
Consider this post. There's no way I'd quote it without putting in the links. I know it's a pain, but I think it's necessary.
CultureCat
You're right...
And because the links are so important to that post, that's precisely the reason I wouldn't be inclined to blog Metafilter. I'd much rather excerpt one of the sites in a MeFi post, and then post a link crediting MeFi.
Back when I used FrontPage for my blog >>shudder<<, I did appreciate being able to preserve HTML formatting when copying from Internet Explorer and pasting to FP.
Is there utility somewhere that lets you copy and paste from a page's HTML? The only solution is to "View | Source" and then hunt. Has some enterprising coder seen the need to placate citation-mad humnanists by producing a utility that does this?
Dennis G. Jerz
Jerz's Literacy Weblog
Just figured this out!
In mozilla firebird (at least on a Mac), you can select a block of text, then control-click (this would be right-click for PCers). One of your options is "view selection source." Choose this item, and voila! The HTML for that block is highlighted in the "view source" window. Then just copy and paste into your blog post, like this:
The quote is from Alex Halavais' blog.
Doesn't work in Safari or Explorer though.
--Dave
Curse you, Bill Gates!
What a brilliant feature...naturally, it's not part of Internet Explorer.
Dennis G. Jerz
Jerz's Literacy Weblog
works on firebird for windows, too
thanks for the tip, dave!
Dear Dennis,
Download Mozilla now! :) I just tried to see if I have "view selection source," and Charlie's right, it does work on Windows! (I have Windows 98, in case that makes a difference). Mozilla has been my default browser for some time now; it is the BEST.
CultureCat