Some Summer Reading: Spring 2006 Issue of Computers and Composition Online

The current issue of CCO is now live and offers an issue that highlights the richness and diversity of interests in Computers and Writing research today. In Theory into Practice Andrea Ascuena and Michael Mattison offer (Re)Wiring Ourselves: The Electrical and Pedagogical Evolution of a Writing Center, a look at an online writing center and its evolving pedagogy. The Rhetoric and Discourse of Instant Messaging by Christine A. Hult & Ryan Richins take a deeper look at IM using discourse analysis. The Virtual Classroom brings a piece by Matt Barton and Charlie Lowe. Databases and Collaborative Spaces for Composition is a helpful look at Content Management Systems for those trying to decide which of the many out there fits their particular needs. The Print to Screen section now has up-to-date abstracts of the print Computers and Composition articles. Our Professional Development section has two articles: Making Blogs Produce: Using Modern Academic Storehouses and Factories by Jen Almjeld and Chaos: An e-interview with Johndan Johnson-Eilola contributed by Robin Murphy. Finally, the Reviews section has an embarrassment of riches this time with Technology and English Studies: Innovative Professional Paths Edited by James Inman and Beth L. Hewett and reviewed by James Schirmer; Podcasts, Vodcasts, and ProfCast, a software review by Paul Cesarini; The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology by Ray Kurzweil, reviewed by Adam Ellwanger; and Radical Feminism, Writing, and Critical Agency: From Manifesto to Modem by Jacqueline Rhodes, reviewed by J. A. Rice.

If after all that reading you are inspired to submit a piece to Computers and Composition Online, we are accepting submissions for the Fall 2006 issue. Send us your submission using the following focus areas:

  • Theory into Practice    Theory, thoughts, and speculation.
  • The Virtual Classroom    Pedagogy and classroom experience.
  • From Print to Screen    Online features that connect with current print journal themes
  • Professional Development    Our past, present and future. Send your interviews and profiles as well as conference updates and calls for submissions.
  • Reviews    Not only books, but sites, events, and other blended media.

Since web publishing gives us some flexibility in timing, we can accept submissions up to November 1, 2006 if the piece is especially polished and web-ready. Earlier submissions have more opportunity for interaction and editing comments from the editors and reviewers, a real advantage for those open to the collaborative nature of web writing and editing.

Send your submission via email in a .zip file or give us an URL. Potential articles need to be web-ready--.doc files or other purely text-based articles are not suitable. Check current and past articles at http://www.bgsu.edu/cconline/home.htm. In preparing your submission, also note that CCO is a refereed journal and allows time for reviews of submissions. Authors wishing to do so may use a mutually agreed upon form of the Creative Commons License for
their article; CCO supports fair use and the open source movement in academia. If you have any questions about format or content, please feel free to
contact us by email. Queries are welcome.

Kris Blair
Editor
kblairATbgnetDOTbgsuDOT edu

Lanette Cadle
Senior Editor
lanetteDOTcadleATgmailDOTcom

tags:  

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
cel4145's picture

Must see: Matt Barton advocating MS Sharepoint

Not to be missed. Hard to believe this free software advocate is advocating Sharepoint for the classroom. Note that the different sections of the article have our author name(s) at the top to differentiate between who is advocating open source and who is supporting MS software ;-)

-----
Charlie | cyberdash

platypus matt's picture

Microsoft is King

And what's unusual about this? Haven't I always complained that the one thing wrong with FOSS is that it isn't proprietary? All you need to do is take a peek at GNU/Linux to see the problem: It ain't Windows.

What I don't understand is why people will think FOSS will succeed when history proves it won't (see history of Soviet Union). All these guys giving it away for free need to wake up and smell the EULA. What does free get you? A free venereal disease (see 60s, US). And that kid that always shared his toys with the other kids? He ain't got no toys, cause those kids didn't give them back (or chewed off their heads). Or he chewed on the same toy and contracted rabies (he's dead now).

Without strong copyright and patent law, America would be a Third World Country with zero prospects for the future. We'd be on plantations harvesting our body organs for export to the Nazi colony on Mars, cause you don't win wars by giving trade secrets to the enemy.

Anyway, I gotta go. My DRM restricts my internet usage to 30 minutes a day. If you read this far without falling out of your command center, you might as well see this.

Check out Barton's other blogs at Armchair Arcade, Free Software Magazine, and Gameology.

cel4145's picture

Forecasting the future

Will there ever be a Vista? The radical new database file system from MS has been completedly dropped. MS Office is yet delayed again.

If you ask me, it's all probably just vaporware ;)

-----
Charlie | cyberdash